%EE# #HE SCIENCE
References continued from page 17
ogy , 129 (2), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje. a115134 Haynes, E.N., Elam, S., Burns, R., Spencer, A., Yancey, E., Kuhnell, P., Alden, J., Walton, M., Reynolds, V., Newman, N., Wright, R.O., Parsons, P.J., Praamsma, M.L., Palmer, C.D., & Dietrich, K.N. (2016). Community engagement and data disclosure in environ- mental health research. Environmental Health Perspectives , 124 (2), A24–A27. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1510411 Isler, M.R., & Corbie-Smith, G. (2012). Practical steps to com- munity-engaged research: From inputs to outcomes. Jour- nal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , 40 (4), 904–914. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00719.x James, K.A., Marshall, J.A., Hokanson, J.E., Meliker, J.R., Zerbe, G.O., & Byers, T.E. (2013). A case-cohort study examining life- time exposure to inorganic arsenic in drinking water and dia- betes mellitus. Environmental Research , 123 , 33–38. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.envres.2013.02.005 James, K.A., Meliker, J.R., Buttenfield, B.E., Byers, T., Zerbe, G.O., Hokanson, J.E., & Marshall, J.A. (2014). Predicting arsenic con- centrations in groundwater of San Luis Valley, Colorado: Impli- cations for individual-level lifetime exposure assessment. Envi- ronmental Geochemistry and Health , 36 (4), 773–782. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10653-014-9595-6 Key, K.D., Furr-Holden, D., Lewis, E.A., Cunningham, R., Zim- merman, M.A., Johnson-Lawrence, V., & Selig, S.E. (2019). The continuum of community engagement in research: A roadmap for understanding and assessing progress. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action , 13 (4), 427– 434. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2019.0064 Kosmala, M., Wiggins, A., Swanson, A., & Simmons, B. (2016). Assessing data quality in citizen science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment , 14 (10), 551–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1436 Li, J.S., Hamann, A., & Beaubien, E. (2020). Outlier detection methods to improve the quality of citizen science data. Interna- tional Journal of Biometeorology , 64 (11), 1825–1833. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00484-020-01968-z Lin Hunter, D.E., Newman, G.J., & Balgopal, M.M. (2023). What’s in a name? The paradox of citizen science and community science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment , 21 (5), 244–250. https:// doi.org/10.1002/fee.2635 Locke, C.M., Anhalt-Depies, C.M., Frett, S., Stenglein, J.L., Cameron, S., Malleshappa, V., Peltier, T.R., Zuckerberg, B., & Townsend, P.A. (2019). Managing a large citizen science project to monitor wild- life. Wildlife Society Bulletin , 43 (1), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/ wsb.943 Maller, S. (2020, December 15). How to Word mail merge to separate PDFs with custom file names and folder locations . Imnoss. https:// imnoss.com/word-mail-merge-to-separate-pdfs/ Odeny, B., & Bosurgi, R. (2022). Time to end parachute science. PLOS Medicine , 19 (9), e1004099. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pmed.1004099
Pocock, M.J.O., Tweddle, J.C., Savage, J., Robinson, L.D., & Roy, H.E. (2017). The diversity and evolution of ecological and environ- mental citizen science. PLOS ONE , 12 (4), e0172579. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172579 Ramírez-Andreotta, M.D., Brody, J.G., Lothrop, N., Loh, M., Beamer, P.I., & Brown, P. (2016). Improving environmental health literacy and justice through environmental exposure results communica- tion. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health , 13 (7), Article 690. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13070690 San Luis Valley Development Resources Group & Council of Gov- ernments. (2021, March 1). San Luis Valley statistical profile . https://www.slvdrg.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2021-SLV- Statistical-Profile.pdf Silvertown, J. (2009). A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution , 24 (9), 467–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tree.2009.03.017 Stanifer, S., Hoover, A.G., Rademacher, K., Rayens, M.K., Hane- berg, W.C., & Hahn, E.J. (2022). Citizen science approach to home radon testing, environmental health literacy and e©cacy. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice , 7 (1), Article 26. https://doi. org/10.5334/cstp.472 Thiros, S.A., Bexfield, L.M., Anning, D.W., & Huntington, J.M. (Eds.). (2010). Conceptual understanding and groundwater quality of selected basin-fill aquifers in the Southwestern United States (Pro- fessional Paper 1781). U.S. Geological Survey. https://pubs.usgs. gov/pp/1781/ U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). Principles of community engagement (2nd ed., NIH Publication No. 11-7782). https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/communityengagement/pdf/PCE_ Report_508_FINAL.pdf U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2024a). National Primary Drinking Water Regulations . https://www.epa.gov/ground- water-and-drinking-water/national-primary-drinking-water- regulations U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2024b). Secondary Drink- ing Water Standards: Guidance for nuisance chemicals . https://www. epa.gov/sdwa/secondary-drinking-water-standards-guidance-nui sance-chemicals Vohland, K., Land-Zandstra, A., Ceccaroni, L., Lemmens, R., Per- elló, J.M.M., Ponti, M., Samson, R., & Wagenknecht, K. (Eds.). (2021). The science of citizen science . Springer Cham. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4 Watson, C. (2021, April 13). Parachute science falls to earth. Nature Index . https://www.nature.com/nature-index/news/parachute- science-falls-to-earth Wilderman, C.C. (2007, June 20–23). Models of community science: Design lessons from the field [Conference session]. Citizen Science Toolkit Conference, Ithaca, NY, United States. https://thrivinge arthexchange.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Models-of-Com munity-Science-Lessons-from-the-Field.pdf
18
%olume • um(er
Powered by FlippingBook