Pillars of Governmental Environmental Public Health | A Guide to Scalable Environmental Public Health Programs
Funding Considerations While our research did not establish specific funding considerations for these programs, secondary EPH pro- grams likely face unique funding challenges due to their cross-cutting nature and emerging status within tradi- tional environmental health frameworks. Funding strat- egies might combine multiple sources, including federal grants, state appropriations, fee-based revenue from reg- ulated entities, foundation grants, and partnerships with other sectors such as healthcare, housing, and emergency management. The evolving nature of these programs often benefits from flexible funding approaches that can adapt to changing priorities and available opportunities. Departments can develop diversified funding portfolios to reduce the dependence on single sources while build- ing sustainable revenue streams through permit fees, inspection charges, and cost-recovery mechanisms where appropriate. Grant funding often provides initial program development support, but long-term sustainability can benefit from integration with ongoing operational bud - gets. Cross-sector partnerships can extend program reach and effectiveness while sharing costs across multiple ben- efiting agencies and organizations. Strategic Considerations for Program Enhancement While this guide focuses on EPH programs, EPH leaders might recognize several cross-cutting elements that can strengthen their program implementation. These include topics such as: • Development of integrated approaches that address multiple EPH issues simultaneously. • Incorporation of health equity principles to address disparities. • Implementation of effective data systems to track activities and outcomes. • Community engagement through transparent risk communication. • Adaptation to climate change impacts across programs. • Preparation for emerging environmental hazards. • Development of sustainable funding strategies. • Investment in workforce development, succession planning, and staff retention. • Engagement in policy development and advocacy.
• Cultivation of interagency collaborations and partnerships. • Implementation of performance management systems for continuous improvement. These considerations, though beyond the scope of our project, may prove important for EPH leadership that seeks to maximize their impact on public health and adapt successfully to evolving EPH challenges. Building on Common Foundations While this guide has outlined specific core program con - siderations for staffing, education, equipment, and funding, several common foundations emerge across EPH programs: 1. Qualified, well-trained personnel are the most essential resource for EPH programs. The combina- tion of appropriate education, specialized training, and professional credentials provides the foundation for effective practice. Departments can prioritize both the recruitment of qualified professionals and ongoing professional development to maintain and enhance workforce capacity. 2. Adaptable program structures that can be scaled to meet local needs and resources are essential for effec- tive implementation. This guidance offers a starting point that can be tailored to match community-specific needs, department resources, and regulatory require- ments across jurisdictions of varying sizes and contexts. 3. Data-driven approaches enable departments to target resources effectively, measure progress, and demonstrate impact. Investment in effective data systems, assessment methodologies, and outcome evaluation is a crucial com- ponent of modern EPH practice. 4. Sustainable funding mechanisms are important for program stability and effectiveness. EPH departments can develop diverse funding strategies that combine fee-based revenue, governmental appropriations, grants, and innovative financing approaches to ensure program sustainability. 5. Strategic partnerships extend the reach and impact of EPH programs. Collaboration with community organizations, healthcare systems, academic insti- tutions, and other governmental agencies multiplies the resources available for addressing environmental health challenges. 6. Properly equipped staff with appropriate tools, tech- nology, and resources are fundamental to program effectiveness. EPH professionals benefit from special -
48
Powered by FlippingBook